首页> 外文OA文献 >Characterization of Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination Assay-Negative Sera following Screening by Treponemal Total Antibody Enzyme Immunoassays ▿
【2h】

Characterization of Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination Assay-Negative Sera following Screening by Treponemal Total Antibody Enzyme Immunoassays ▿

机译:梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集试验阴性血清的鉴定,通过三联体总抗体酶免疫分析法筛选▿

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Following a laboratory audit, a significant number of Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA)-negative sera were identified when TPPA was used as a confirmatory assay of syphilis enzyme immunoassay (EIA) screening-reactive sera (SSRS). Sera giving such discrepant results were further characterized to assess their significance. A panel of 226 sera was tested by the Abbott Murex ICE Syphilis EIA and then by the Newmarket Syphilis EIA II. TPPA testing was performed on 223 sera. Further testing by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test, the Mercia Syphilis IgM EIA, the fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA-ABS) assay, and INNO-LIA immunoblotting was undertaken in discrepant cases. One hundred eighty-seven of 223 (83.8%) SSRS were TPPA reactive, while 26 (11.6%) sera which were reactive in both the ICE and Newmarket EIAs were nonreactive by TPPA. The majority (68%) of the TPPA-discrepant sera were from HIV-positive patients and did not represent early acute cases, based on previous or follow-up samples, which were available for 22/26 samples. FTA-ABS testing was performed on 24 of these sera; 14 (58.3%) were FTA-ABS positive, and 10 (41.7%) were FTA-ABS negative. Twenty-one of these 26 sera were tested by INNO-LIA, and an additional 4 FTA-ABS-negative samples were positive. In this study, significant numbers (18/26) of SSRS- and TPPA-negative sera were shown by further FTA-ABS and LIA (line immunoblot assay) testing to be positive. The reason why certain sera are negative by TPPA but reactive by treponemal EIA and other syphilis confirmatory assays is not clear, and these initial findings should be further explored.
机译:经过实验室审核,当将TPPA用作梅毒酶免疫测定(EIA)筛查反应性血清(SSRS)的确证测定时,鉴定出大量梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集测定(TPPA)阴性血清。产生这种差异结果的血清被进一步表征以评估其重要性。雅培Murex ICE Syphilis EIA,然后再通过Newmarket Syphilis EIA II,测试了226种血清。 TPPA测试在223个血清上进行。在差异病例中,通过了性病研究实验室(VDRL)测试,梅毒梅毒IgM EIA,荧光性线粒体抗体(FTA-ABS)分析和INNO-LIA免疫印迹进行了进一步测试。 223个SSRS中有187个(83.8%)对TPPA有反应性,而ICE和Newmarket EIAs中有26个(11.6%)的血清对TPPA不具有反应性。 TPPA差异血清中的大多数(68%)来自HIV阳性患者,根据先前或后续的样本(可用于22/26样本),并不代表早期急性病例。对其中的24种血清进行FTA-ABS测试; FTA-ABS阳性的14例(58.3%),FTA-ABS阴性的10例(41.7%)。 INNO-LIA测试了这26个血清中的21个,另外4个FTA-ABS阴性样品为阳性。在这项研究中,通过进一步的FTA-ABS和LIA(线免疫印迹测定)测试,大量(18/26)的SSRS和TPPA阴性血清呈阳性。 TPPA阴性的某些血清为什么通过TPA和其他梅毒的确证性检测呈反应性的原因尚不清楚,这些初步发现应进一步探索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号